National Dem congressman: Force gun owners to get rid of assault weapons

[Mrjenkins]

Democratic congressman: Force gun owners to get rid of assault weapons

I seriously hope he is just shouting his mouth. They can't have mine regardless of what they think or do. It's just a piece of paper that's breaking our constitution's set guidelines.

Read More

 

[billdeserthill]

Far as I'm concerned the gun-haters are doing us a service by broadcasting their hate, although I pretty much do vote straight NRA ticket

 

[MadDuner]

I hope he gets stabbed to death by another Democrat - using a dull butter knife.

 

[nvshooter]

The type of sewage he's talkin' is what fires-up those who own guns but usually do not vote, or only vote in General Election years. Such a law as this fool is proposing would never pass Supreme Court scrutiny. Trump would never sign it. It would never survive the Senate. I doubt it would ever get out of committee. He's just a loudmouth, dingbat Freedom-hater who hopes to ride the decreasing wave of hysteria following the Parkland thing. I suppose this Swalwell glans penis will be looking to get Davie Piggypoop at one of his campaign rallies, so as to keep the hysterical fear bubbling along...

Just a fanciful dream, but would not it be fun to take one of those guns and hit a home run with his worthless brain bucket? Just imagine the pure pleasure of laying with great force and speed, the stock upside his empty head. Would love to hear the sound of that...

 

[nvshooter]

I hope he gets stabbed to death by another Democrat-- using a dull butter knife.

Go ahead. Tell us how you really feel...

 

[MadDuner]

Go ahead. Tell us how you really feel...

What I really think the left needs - is a discount coupon for 5 gallons of gasoline, and for them all to watch a self-help tutorial video on self-immolation. I'd be happy to send them a lighter. If all was successful - I would also provide an ice pick to help put the fire out. I'm a helpful kinda guy.

 

[nvshooter]

I'm a helpful kinda guy.

After reading your post, I'll sure say so! But I'm conflicted. Self-immolation, to do it most expeditiously, requires an accelerant. Gasoline is easy to contain and to transport, so that seems like a good fuel for such an act. But gasoline is a fossil fuel and as such, is not on the liberals' approval list for self-immolation. The dimbulbs on the Evil Left may very well want to make a statement by killing themselves (and we should let them), but their opposition to any sort of fuel we have to dig out of the ground precludes the use of such. They certainly cannot use a firearm for suicide; that's not even part of the conversation. Maybe a bunch of them can gather on the roof of a tall building and all throw themselves over the edge at the same time. That, I would like to see. Gravity has no carbon footprint...

We gotta stop writing stuff like this. Firearms owners are not of this mind. We should harbor no ill will for those who oppose our support for the Freedom that God has granted to us. Best thing we can do for our opponents is to defeat them, over and over again.

 

[MadDuner]

After reading your post, I'll sure say so! But I'm conflicted. Self-immolation, to do it most expeditiously, requires an accelerant. Gasoline is easy to contain and to transport, so that seems like a good fuel for such an act. But gasoline is a fossil fuel and as such, is not on the liberals' approval list for self-immolation. The dimbulbs on the Evil Left may very well want to make a statement by killing themselves (and we should let them), but their opposition to any sort of fuel we have to dig out of the ground precludes the use of such. They certainly cannot use a firearm for suicide; that's not even part of the conversation. Maybe a bunch of them can gather on the roof of a tall building and all throw themselves over the edge at the same time. That, I would like to see. Gravity has no carbon footprint...

We gotta stop writing stuff like this. Firearms owners are not of this mind. We should harbor no ill will for those who oppose our support for the Freedom that God has granted to us. Best thing we can do for our opponents is to beat them, over and over again.

With a bat!

 

[nvshooter]

Not going to comment, other than to say you've made a small editorial change to what I originally wrote. Per that minuscule change, I say "No comment."

 

[curtmini14]

and just how will they get this done.i will not comply.

 

[billdeserthill]

After reading your post, I'll sure say so! But I'm conflicted. Self-immolation, to do it most expeditiously, requires an accelerant. Gasoline is easy to contain and to transport, so that seems like a good fuel for such an act. But gasoline is a fossil fuel and as such, is not on the liberals' approval list for self-immolation. The dimbulbs on the Evil Left may very well want to make a statement by killing themselves (and we should let them), but their opposition to any sort of fuel we have to dig out of the ground precludes the use of such. They certainly cannot use a firearm for suicide; that's not even part of the conversation. Maybe a bunch of them can gather on the roof of a tall building and all throw themselves over the edge at the same time. That, I would like to see. Gravity has no carbon footprint...

We gotta stop writing stuff like this. Firearms owners are not of this mind. We should harbor no ill will for those who oppose our support for the Freedom that God has granted to us. Best thing we can do for our opponents is to defeat them, over and over again.

I say we compromise,
any lib worth his salt can get by with a quart of gas so long as one of us is nearby to give him a re-light in case he goes out

 

[nvshooter]

and just how will they get this done. i will not comply.

I doubt very few will also comply. Thing is, this bit of election year spoutery will never go anywhere. It's just this Swalwell schmekel making absurd noises to attract attention to his campaign. I don't doubt he also believes he's pishing up a rope, but there is no bad publicity. Look: His idiocy has already gotten him this present coverage so in just that, he's had people hear of him who most likely have never heard the name before. The thing I'd like to see is which one is faster to being in front of a TV camera: Schmekelwell or Chucky "Sch*tbag" Schumer?

 

[joefoam]

Again with the total ignorance of the subject. "assault weapons" are used in a miniscule portion of "gun violence" so eliminating them completely would only have a miniscule effect. $1000.00 for a good quality AR is an insult, so his cost for repurchasing is way low, and where will the money come from? As far as Australia getting it right, the violence rate did not undergo a dramatic drop, it followed a decades old downward trend as it has here in the States and with their neighbors in New Zealand, even with more guns being introduced into the population in both countries. What the confiscation has done has spawned a huge, violent black market for weapons. Think that wouldn't happen here too? We declared a war on drugs decades ago, how has that worked out?

 

[nvshooter]

We declared a war on drugs decades ago; how has that worked out?

Was that Nixon or Johnson? In any event, that "war" has not gone well for the government. Seems they never put much effort into it and now, we have several States that have legalized marijuana. As a trucker who has nothing but contempt for illicit drugs, I can't understand such a legalization of a drug that has pretty much shown itself to be a gateway drug to even more dangerous chemicals. This is Daniel Moynihan's defining downward what's deviant and what isn't. The way the Evil Left wants to make aberrant and abhorrent behavior permissible, we have to ask ourselves as a society "When will violent rape or murder on our city streets be considered to be permissible social behavior?" Don't laugh; it's probably sooner than you'd ever think.

The mission of the Evil Left is destroy the norms and standards that define a polite society, so that such a society can be replaced with the dreamworld of iron-fisted socialism. Or even with Communism. Look at Venezuela to see the stellar success of socialism: The people who live there sift through garbage dumps for food, and the nation has a serious shortage of toilet paper. The finest example of Communism is North Korea. No need to discuss that one any further...

 

[joefoam]

Was that Nixon or Johnson? In any event, that "war" has not gone well for the government. Seems they never put much effort into it and now, we have several States that have legalized marijuana. As a trucker who has nothing but contempt for illicit drugs, I can't understand such a legalization of a drug that has pretty much shown itself to be a gateway drug to even more dangerous chemicals. This is Daniel Moynihan's defining downward what's deviant and what isn't. The way the Evil Left wants to make aberrant and abhorrent behavior permissible, we have to ask ourselves as a society "When will violent rape or murder on our city streets be considered to be permissible social behavior?" Don't laugh; it's probably sooner than you'd ever think.

The mission of the Evil Left is destroy the norms and standards that define a polite society, so that such a society can be replaced with the dreamworld of iron-fisted socialism. Or even with Communism. Look at Venezuela to see the stellar success of socialism: The people who live there sift through garbage dumps for food, and the nation has a serious shortage of toilet paper. The finest example of Communism is North Korea. No need to discuss that one any further...

Nixon started the war on drugs in the seventies. You'd have to ask the folks in Scandinavia how opening their borders to refugees like good little socialist/progressive/liberals is working out. The rape and murder you speak of in the 'no go' zones within those countries has people hiding in their own homes. The police don't even enter those areas. You can't speak out about it though without being labeled a racist/fascist, and in some cases jailed as they have no 1st amendment rights. Wait until they remove the method to protect the 1st amendment by gutting the 2nd amendment here and watch the chaos. The progressives/liberals who advocate for legalization of marijuana are former hippies or children of hippies who don't realize that the weed being sold as innocuous is an order of magnitude stronger than what they were exposed to.

 

[MadDuner]

It's only a matter of time before we have a complete FAILURE Of CIVILITY.

 

[joefoam]

It's only a matter of time before we have a complete FAILURE Of CIVILITY.

Matter of time? I'd say it's already here. And those pesky AR rifles are the cause. If we would just hand them over to the government the Unicorns could come back out of the forest and we could all just get along. I really think that is what some people believe, they must be using the weed.

 

[nvshooter]

And those pesky AR rifles are the cause.

Yes, indeed. It's a long- and well-known fact among liberals that the protruding pistol grip of the AR-type rifle has the power to take control of a man's mind and cause him to commit the most heinous of crimes. And let us not forget that the bayonet lug is right there with the protruding pistol grip. Figures developed by numerous studies of criminal acts have determined that the direct cause of the ever-so-frequent, drive-by bayonettings about which we read so much today is because the firearm used had a bayonet lug on it. Co-linear studies also show that AR-type rifles that were never factory-equipped with a bayonet lug are rarely, if ever, shown to have been used in a drive-by bayonet attack. I will not even go into the effects a collapsing stock has on the owner of a rifle so equipped. To have a collapsing stock on a rifle, liberals believe, is an even greater assault on what's good and proper than to have an ISIS murder squad go into a K-6 grade school and kill several hundred pre-teen kids.

The previous is, of course, a sarcastic indictment of the stupidity that gun-haters throw at us who own and use our firearms entirely within the law and within what is polite. Knowledge and understanding about guns cannot be talked-into liberals, no matter how much effort is made to do it. Best thing we who respect our firearms and our Liberty to own and to use them is to vote in every election and if God is good, we will best the opposition over and over and over again...

 

[joefoam]

Yes, indeed. It's a long- and well-known fact among liberals that the protruding pistol grip of the AR-type rifle has the power to take control of a man's mind and cause him to commit the most heinous of crimes. And let us not forget that the bayonet lug is right there with the protruding pistol grip. Figures developed by numerous studies of criminal acts have determined that the direct cause of the ever-so-frequent, drive-by bayonettings about which we read so much today is because the firearm used had a bayonet lug on it. Co-linear studies also show that AR-type rifles that were never factory-equipped with a bayonet lug are rarely, if ever, shown to have been used in a drive-by bayonet attack. I will not even go into the effects a collapsing stock has on the owner of a rifle so equipped. To have a collapsing stock on a rifle, liberals believe, is an even greater assault on what's good and proper than to have an ISIS murder squad go into a K-6 grade school and kill several hundred pre-teen kids.

The previous is, of course, a sarcastic indictment of the stupidity that gun-haters throw at us who own and use our firearms entirely within the law and within what is polite. Knowledge and understanding about guns cannot be talked-into liberals, no matter how much effort is made to do it. Best thing we who respect our firearms and our Liberty to own and to use them is to vote in every election and if God is good, we will best the opposition over and over and over again...

Well put, unfortunately the passion possessed by the anti gun crowd will not allow them to reason logically. As I've seen posted here before it's like talking to a rock and I don't know how to break through.

 

[MadDuner]

I still say using a very large bat would be useful in breaking through. If nothing else - it would readily demonstrate to them how beneficial having a firearm available can be when used defensively. I'm not swinging a bat at anybody that is holding a gun. Come to think of it, that appears to be a pretty universal outlook amongst bat swingers the world over. Bayonet lug and folding stock not required.