UBCs violate the original meaning of the commerce clause — and are likely ineffective at combating the very malady they’re alleged to address.
Stop talking sense to those too intent upon the institution of tyranny in America to hear you. Multiple cesspool nations in South America have super-strict gun control laws, yet crimes involving fatal shootings are at atrocious numbers. Criminals look at a page of printed law, and see it to be blank. The Deception-crats know this. What this criminal enterprise known as the Tyranny-crat Party wants is YOU disarmed. Why? Ask Mao. Ask Castro. Ask Pol Pot. Ask Stalin. My guess is that each will provide for you similar answers.We already have Background Checks. Nothing they add will change anything favorably for anyone, nor will it stop a single shooting!
I doubt the US military will go along with a confiscation law. Our military is composed of our sons and daughters. We are their parents. Doubtful our kids would fire on their parents. The military is sworn to the Constitution, not to Pelosi and Chucky Bullschumer. The Supreme Court is also sworn to the Constitution. I'm gonna guess that as soon as Congress overrides Trump's veto, the several pro-Liberty groups will file suits to stop its institution or to negate it on all its points. There is always an effective date, so there will be several weeks for NRA and others to get to Court and file the suits. Might also see a federal judge block it, too. Trump has put over a hundred on the Bench, so it's a possibility. Praise God He gave us the monumental men who gave us divided government and a slow, cumbersome, difficult way to promulgate our laws. Our Constitution is "Brilliance Guided by Divine Providence." Amen.If they finally nut-up to go after the guns in any manner, they will risk much to achieve that goal! I wonder how far that will go before calmer heads put it to a stop, or will they push it to its inevitable conclusion and get an awful lot of folks hurt or kill't!
True, the Criminal Left can never get a repeal through the Congress to get it before the States to ratify or to defeat. The idea is to chip-away tiny parts of Freedom until it's just a skeletal remains of what it was when we grew up. A law is "constitutional" until someone sues it in Court. You can sue a law and win. I can sue that victory to the next-highest Court. Our battle will eventually end-up at the Supreme Court. They may take it for consideration or not.Hint: they know they would never reach the needed numbers to actually do it, so again, WHY are they doing what they are doing .. ?
I about teared-up when I read that. To know that so many who Swore are still out there and still ready to defend Liberty with their lives if need be hits me right where my love for my country resides. You really struck me with your continuing allegiance to our country, to the American People and to our priceless Freedom. It's Americans like you who allow me to be stupid when the time comes to do my part to defend my Liberty.Figure there are close to 50 years worth of fully-trained U.S. VETS with skills and attitude and a deep sense of what is right and wrong, and those same Vets remember the sacred oath we all swore, an oath with no expiration date, and that is the real threat they should fear! We Vets are among the entire population, we are everywhere and while mostly quiet, someday our voices will be heard loud and clear with a finality without question!