- Messages
- 960
- Reactions
- 1,824
Oh, THAT kind of Changes! IF you need any thing, you know where to find me!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look to your left. See the brain-damaged liberals lining-up to surrender their Liberty...Anyone who says an AR is a machine gun is stupid. PERIOD!
Unfortunately gun owners are outnumbered 2:1, which means the majority of Americans could care less about what happens to gun owners.Look to your left. See the brain-damaged liberals lining-up to surrender their Liberty...
I don't know about the 2:1 ratio. Bunches of Commie progressives (that I have the displeasure of working with) are fairly well armed. They don't talk like they're anti-gun at all, yet they support the gun grabbers (duplicitous?) They just seem to want "us" disarmed for some odd reason.Unfortunately gun owners are outnumbered 2:1, which means the majority of Americans could care less about what happens to gun owners.
The 2:1 ratio doesn't account for political affiliation, just actual ownership.I don't know about the 2:1 ratio. Bunches of Commie progressives (that I have the displeasure of working with) are fairly well armed. They don't talk like they're anti-gun at all, yet they support the gun grabbers (duplicitous?) They just seem to want "us" disarmed for some odd reason.
Gotcha. It's a damn shame gun owners are outnumbered by 2/3. Lots of folks missing out on some real fun, wholesome entertainment and sense of independence.The 2:1 ratio doesn't account for political affiliation, just actual ownership.
I'm sure it has a lot to do with your environment. If you are trapped in some high rise apartment in the middle of a metropolitan area, just finding a place to shoot can be a challenge.Gotcha. It's a damn shame gun owners are outnumbered by 2/3. Lots of folks missing out on some real fun, wholesome entertainment and sense of independence.
I guess my understanding is lacking as much as theirs for me.
Unfortunately gun owners are outnumbered 2:1, which means the majority of Americans could care less about what happens to gun owners.
As an historical aside, how many folks using the term "assault rifle" know that it was Adolf Hitler himself who coined the term originally to describe the "Sturmgewehr 44" (STG44), a selective-fire rifle with a less powerful 7.92X33 Kurz cartridge compared to the full-size 7.92X57 Mauser. Great post, TY!For your information! Feel free to copy and print this so you can use against the anti 2nd sheeple!
An assault rifle must meet the following 4 criteria:
1)Detachable magazine fed. (so not a belt fed firearm, like a medium machine gun)
2) Shoulder fired. ie a rifle…(well, that's pretty obvious in hindsight)
3) Select fire (shooter can choose between semi-auto and burst/auto fire.) If a firearm is incapable of burst/full-auto, it's not an assault rifle. If it's only capable of full auto/burst fire, it's not an assault rifle either.
4) Intermediate calibre (Between a full power round like a battle rifle and a pistol round) So even something like a select fire FN FAL doesn't count, because the rounds it's firing are too darn big.
Tools of all sorts, including firearms, have specific categories. A jackhammer has a similar shaped end to it as a flat bladed screwdriver, but they're not the same thing. Think of it this way. You can use a butter knife to unscrew something, but it doesn't then define it as a screwdriver.
An assault rifle is a sub-set of all rifles. Rifles are largely defined by the firing action, the calibre, and size.
An assault rifle is not a machine gun. It's a rifle.
It's also not a sub-machinegun. An SMG is an automatic, shoulder fired firearm that fires pistol calibre rounds. It's historically close to an assault rifle, and their limitations (predominately in range) drove both the Germans and the Soviets to come up with successful assault rifle designs.
It's not a battle rifle. A battle rifle fires full-power rounds, such as .303, 7.62x 51 NATO, etc. These rifles have greater recoil, and can fire round much further, and with more power than an assault rifle. Further than is needed in 99% of fights. That 1% is coming back to bite in Afghanistan at the moment, where big open areas are leading to engagement ranges further than an assault rifle can properly engage. (The Soviets, armed with AKM's and AK-74's had the same problem in the early 1980's as they were shot at with old Lee-Enfield bolt-action rifles.)
Assault rifles are not defined by their looks, or their colours, or their size. The size of the magazine isn't part of the definition either.
"The L1A1 was issued by the British Army. The British Army successfully defeated the FAL-armed Argentine Army using the same semiautomatic service rifle" . There, FIFY!If you read my post I say what is legal. I also spelled out what a weapon of war is legally in the United States.
The L1A1 was issued by the British Army. The British Army successfully defeated the Argentine Army using a semiautomatic service rifle.
Politics play on ignorance. That is why the electoral college elects the president not the people. Our voice is reflected in the people chosen to vote in the electoral college.
You gave good examples of idiot liberals. The suggestion that big business is patriotic or global warming isn't real are a couple more.
The GOP play on gun rights and illegal immigration yet for decades the border has been open to the drug cartels. The NRA defends gun rights and lean o
Follow the money to see
I left ignorance in question because I don't underestimate their lawyers. In the end it will all be settled in a courtroom.
I would like very much for someone to say the 1911 .45 was designed to kill people. The AR15 was designed to kill people. All of you are drawn to it because of it's lethality. Yet the NRA says it defends sportsmans gun rights.
Maybe as a description of the whole population. But we must remember the United States has I'll estimate one-third of her population under legal voting age, so the numbers who support firearms ownership is about equal to those who don't. We saw something similar in the 2016 election: Trump wins 63 million votes for Liberty; Himmlery wins about an equal number for socialist tyranny. A second-grade boy in a Peoria, IL elementary school had no opinion...Unfortunately gun owners are outnumbered 2:1 . . .
So!
Just like the Swiss famously told the Nazis who outnumbered them 2/1 when they were threatened with marching troupes into Switzerland, Upon entry to our country by German occupiers, each Swiss citizen will fire his rifle TWICE, and your invasion will have failed!
I'm usually thrifty with my ammo, but I could make exceptions!They are getting more than two shots from me!!!
This is a really good post. I enjoyed the read. thanks for having the stones to post it.The AR-15 and the semi-automatic AK-47 are not "weapons of war." No standing military on this planet issues a semi-automatic weapon as its front-line battle rifle. These two weapons only look like weapons seen in war. Liberals are stuck on the appearance of things. They see Black men, Asian men and White men as different. Conservatives see Americans-- without distinction. Because an AR-type rifle has a bayonet lug and a collapsing buttstock (like is seen on an issue M4 carbine), the liberals so ignorantly and so incorrectly call the common AR-15 rifle a "weapon of war." They do so to raise fear based upon the ignorance of so many Americans when the discussion comes to firearms.
The ideology of liberalism requires falsehood, fear and ignorance to exist and to survive. If liberals ever told the real truth about for what they stand, their ideology would wither on the vine and blow away on the wind of reality. Every election cycle, the Criminal Left and the Criminal Left Media tells our senior citizens that Republicans are going to take Medicare and Medicaid away from them. Anybody with half a brain knows that's pure bullschumer, but fear is one hellsinki of a motivator.
Then there is entrenched ignorance. There are many Americans who absolutely refuse to come around to believe in conservative principles. Conservatism is the idea that every man is responsible for his position in life; he gets there by the sweat of his brow combined with his intelligence. Liberals prefer that someone else do the sweating (also known as federal money) and when that is the case, intelligence is not necessary. Conservatives work hard for what they want. Liberals make more and more loud and obnoxious noises to secure what they want.
I am amazed at how frightened gun owners are at the reality of the 2nd amendment. I sense this reluctance even among you guys to come out and say what the 2nd amendment is and what it isn't is the right to hunt or defend property or self. Wrong wrong wrong. The 2nd amendment guarantees the right for every American to own the same rifle as the US Army. It was modified and a tax was added to own full auto weapons. Is the AR15 a home defense weapon? Is the Garand? A shotgun is the best weapon not a rifle caliber in an apartment building. Trying to make a point is all. The law allows for the defense against the US Army and the public refuses to even discuss it.
I say change the constitution article 5 and end ownership of all weapons other than weapons for hunting, home defense, and self defense. If nobody has the stones to stand up and say what the 2nd amendment is then why have it? Nobody cares enough to even say it much less argue the fact. I have mine buried so I don't give a bubblegum what you folks give away. This is what some guys say and that is just great. If heaven forbid there are ever soldiers on our streets then a .22 long rifle will get a machine gun. Guns will be everywhere trust me. Till then end the 20 round mag rifle all 120 million. It is a bubblegum show at both ends.