JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
that is one stupid a-s requirement. I'm sure many of the voters were LARGE VOLUME owners, mostly like THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR, George Soros and other progressive/libtards who are trying to cause dissension in the ranks of gun owners and smaller more conservative shareholders. Just wait, this aint the last time this will happen, theres a lot of money backing the effort!
 
Tried to paste a paragraph here from the article, but was unsuccessful. The paragraph related that the report wants Ruger to report how it tracks its guns that have been used in crimes, et cetera. How in helsinki is Ruger supposed to track how its products are used? That's as idiotic a desire as was that stupid Question 1 vote we had in Nevada for the 2016 election. That dumb thing wanted a background check to be run every time a gun was handed from one person to another.

Imagine your and your adult son are on a hunt, five miles into the boonies. Per some lousy circumstance, the scope on your son's rifle has failed. You hand your rifle to him to take a sure shot. Bloomberg wants a background check to be done for that transfer. Your son shoots the elk and the each of you exchange rifles as you begin to walk toward the elk. Bloomberg wants a background check for that transfer, too. That far out, no background check has been done. How could one have been? When the two of you get to the elk, unspecified circumstances require a third transfer of rifles. That third transfer, lacking yet another background check, constitutes a felony because the first two had no background checks run on them. Just how are background checks to be conducted when there is no law enforcement or firearms dealer close at hand to do them? The answer is they cannot be. This is why our Attorney General Adam Laxalt is not bothering to enforce the law, which passed by less than 1% of the vote.

This report by Ruger to its shareholders is on the same level of idiocy as it would be for a boat maker to report on how many of its twin-engine, inboard craft are used to smuggle drugs into Florida. The maker of a product has no responsibility for what the consumer does with that product after the purchase. There are defective-product liability issues now and then but for the most part once you own it, you are responsible for how you use it. Burdening a manufacturer with how or why a consumer uses a product is nothing but the cowardice of liberalism.
 
Last Edited:
It sure makes a guy wonder how hard the Leftists worked - or spent - to get enough shareholder leverage to pull that off. This has Bloomburglar and Soros fingerprints all over it.
 

Upcoming Events

Crossroads of the West Gun Show
Sandy, UT

New Resource Reviews

Back Top