- Messages
- 2,948
- Reactions
- 1,925
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While people that exhibit uncontrolled violence should be carefully monitored, my concern is who's definition of domestic abuse is to be the criteria? I have seen people arrested for domestic abuse for breaking their dinner plates in a fit of rage over an argument. That would not be my definition of abuse. Also in my experience I have seen many cases in which I believed that it took two to tango. Both parties responsible. Should a person be denied the right to self defense under such circumstance? There are many mitigating circumstances to be considered. One size does not fit all.
That power and control you speak of is a two way street. I call breaking something a demonstration of anger. But I am no longer a judge. The courts have removed the male toxicity in response. Females on the other hand, are free to practice their weapon of choice, verbal abuse and psychological torment. Females enjoy such advantage in Marriage, judiciary favor, and Public favor when confronted by a male. And never suspect for one minute that they are unwilling to use such advantage for personal control. You lost the Power and Control circle. There are many studies to eliminate the male response to female activities. They enjoy great favor in the great liberal and female oriented bastions of higher learning. I wood not defend actions of Males who physically abuse family members, but in my estimation, use of the power and control wheel is a two handed sword that is easily used by either party. When it is used to delete a mans, or womens ability to defend there selves in a very hostile world then the intent is suspect to other agenda's. As you point out it becomes just one more tool to disarm the citizens any way possible.
Sorry borderwarrior, if not for intimidation of who has the power/control, would someone need to demonstrate their anger?
Further, did you see where i delinated a gender on whom is abusing the facets of the P/C elements towards their intimates? Tis your personal biases showinging.
So, in a SD incident, one hopes all investigators accomplish due diligence and if previous/current DV is in the mix then so be it and those are duly and appropriately judically tried.
Anger is as normal as any other human emotion. And demonstrating it is also a normal human reaction to adverse stimulus. As to my personal bias, could be a touch of that based solely on years of officiating domestic disputes, both in the field and from the bench. Never does one size fit all, as higher education fanatics would have you believe.
Sure it is normal. There are definitely two sides to the issue. Which one takes precedence? As always, the female version.So borderwarrior, YOU raise my ire to the point i demonstrate and express my anger towards you through intimidation, slamming my fist, breaking things, etc., where you personally feel threaten, to the point, you believe feel your life is in danger. Ah, now there might be assault or initiate SD protocols...open and shut two strangers in a brawl.
Same scenario, except you depend on me to provide your housing, $$$ to care for our offspring, etc. You are emotionally connected and worried about the welfare of the offspring so YOU silently endure you continued demonstrations of your anger and displeasure and you go to LE you still lose your financial support don't you?
Normal expression of violance generated anger towards another, especially an intimate, is not normal.
Abuses abound on both sides. My point, the extreme of battery can not be tolerated. No doubt. But if there is anyone in the world that knows what buttons to push to drive you over the edge. It's your spouse. And as yet the judiciary has not addressed that form of abuse as any form of justification for anger.
Fortunately they have not figured a way to have a family without a partner yet. But their trying.
I disagree. Right now, it's "domestic abuse." A year from now, it will be your guns are confiscated because you didn't get your wife roses for Valentine's Day. The Evil Left will create more and more ways to unhand a man of his firearms. "Mission Creep" is what they do when they seek to deny or destroy Individual Freedom. Give a gun-grabber an inch, he'll pish and moan and whine and bawl until he gets a mile. Then he'll want more after that. We need a good Second Amendment case that takes us back to the firearms Freedoms we had on December 15, 1791...